No money fat chick chatrandom


14-Mar-2016 19:15

Examples of this would be if you have a cogeneration engine or turbine where all of the heat being recovered off the generator isn’t being fully utilized during the summer, or if you have a manufacturing process that requires heat that is being vented to the atmosphere instead of being recaptured at the end of the process.If your facility’s electricity cost is

Your thermal energy needs to be very, very cheap before an absorption chiller can compete with an electric unit on an input energy cost basis.Option 2: Install a 100 ton single-effect absorption chiller.

.11/k Wh to operate an electric chiller and your absorption fuel energy cost is

Examples of this would be if you have a cogeneration engine or turbine where all of the heat being recovered off the generator isn’t being fully utilized during the summer, or if you have a manufacturing process that requires heat that is being vented to the atmosphere instead of being recaptured at the end of the process.

If your facility’s electricity cost is

Your thermal energy needs to be very, very cheap before an absorption chiller can compete with an electric unit on an input energy cost basis.Option 2: Install a 100 ton single-effect absorption chiller.

.11/k Wh to operate an electric chiller and your absorption fuel energy cost is [[

Examples of this would be if you have a cogeneration engine or turbine where all of the heat being recovered off the generator isn’t being fully utilized during the summer, or if you have a manufacturing process that requires heat that is being vented to the atmosphere instead of being recaptured at the end of the process.If your facility’s electricity cost is $0.11/k Wh to operate an electric chiller and your absorption fuel energy cost is $0, in this scenario you would save almost $9,000 per year in chiller energy.Are you considering installing an absorption chiller in your facility?It can be a tough decision to make, so be certain that it will make sense financially before purchasing or agreeing to anything!Low-pressure steam will be supplied by a 78% efficient boiler plant.Assuming a northeastern location and a cooling load typical of an institutional campus, the site requires approximately 116,000 ton-hours of cooling a year from the new chiller.Carrier has a great explanation on one of their product pages here: “The refrigeration cycle for a conventional vapor compression chiller and an absorption chiller are similar in that both produce chilled water via the evaporation and condensation of a refrigerant at different pressures within the machine.

||

Examples of this would be if you have a cogeneration engine or turbine where all of the heat being recovered off the generator isn’t being fully utilized during the summer, or if you have a manufacturing process that requires heat that is being vented to the atmosphere instead of being recaptured at the end of the process.

If your facility’s electricity cost is $0.11/k Wh to operate an electric chiller and your absorption fuel energy cost is $0, in this scenario you would save almost $9,000 per year in chiller energy.

Are you considering installing an absorption chiller in your facility?

It can be a tough decision to make, so be certain that it will make sense financially before purchasing or agreeing to anything!

Low-pressure steam will be supplied by a 78% efficient boiler plant.

Assuming a northeastern location and a cooling load typical of an institutional campus, the site requires approximately 116,000 ton-hours of cooling a year from the new chiller.

]], in this scenario you would save almost ,000 per year in chiller energy.

Are you considering installing an absorption chiller in your facility?

It can be a tough decision to make, so be certain that it will make sense financially before purchasing or agreeing to anything!

Low-pressure steam will be supplied by a 78% efficient boiler plant.

Assuming a northeastern location and a cooling load typical of an institutional campus, the site requires approximately 116,000 ton-hours of cooling a year from the new chiller.

, in this scenario you would save almost ,000 per year in chiller energy.Are you considering installing an absorption chiller in your facility?It can be a tough decision to make, so be certain that it will make sense financially before purchasing or agreeing to anything!Low-pressure steam will be supplied by a 78% efficient boiler plant.Assuming a northeastern location and a cooling load typical of an institutional campus, the site requires approximately 116,000 ton-hours of cooling a year from the new chiller.Carrier has a great explanation on one of their product pages here: “The refrigeration cycle for a conventional vapor compression chiller and an absorption chiller are similar in that both produce chilled water via the evaporation and condensation of a refrigerant at different pressures within the machine.

[[

Your thermal energy needs to be very, very cheap before an absorption chiller can compete with an electric unit on an input energy cost basis.

Option 2: Install a 100 ton single-effect absorption chiller.

||

Your thermal energy needs to be very, very cheap before an absorption chiller can compete with an electric unit on an input energy cost basis.Option 2: Install a 100 ton single-effect absorption chiller.

]]